Blog - Sunday February 7, 2010 - 1 Comment

Cyber-Terrorism vs. Cyber-Warfare: Defending The United Networks of America

Seven-year-old, Mark Fielding looked up from his computer. He was very annoyed. “Mommmm!” He yelled in a way that was sure to get her attention. “The Internet is down again.” It was the last thing she heard before the lights went off. Mark turned on his iPod touch and opened a blank Safari window to use as a flashlight. He found his mother by the front door. She was looking out on a darkened landscape. Neither of them had any idea just how dark it truly was.

Ten minutes earlier, a remarkably powerful computer virus had destroyed six of America’s most important data centers. Five minutes earlier, a different piece of code killed every caching server on the three biggest CDN’s. At Zero Hour, the attack culminated in the computer-controlled destruction of the entire power grid in North America. It would take days to fix, months to fully repair and the cost would be measured in Trillions, not Billions.

America’s days as an economic super-power had ended. All the financial data at the IRS was destroyed, six of America’s major financial institutions could not access their records. No one could find a digitized medical record in any database with proper metadata (the data that describes data). With our data destroyed … our economy ceased to be. The breakdown of social services was immediate and devastating. The doing of life would never be the same. America, as we knew it, was gone.

Who did this? The Chinese? The Russians? Religious Extremists? No. It was a small group of unaffiliated, highly motivated computer hackers. Who did they work for? Anyone. Who paid them? No one. Why did they do it? Because they could. What was their punishment? Sadly, they were never found.

What an emotionally unsatisfying way to end a great science fiction story. No enemy? No villain? No narrative? Try selling it to Hollywood. What bad writing!

Perhaps, but this is not science fiction, this is a very real probable future for The United Networks of America. Which is were we all live right now!

Most people interface with The United Networks of America through the world wide web. However, you can also gain access through your wireless phone or over the public Internet. You may think of the Net as Google, Yahoo, eBay, Amazon or CNN.com, but there are literally millions of private, local area and wide area networks that all have access points on Al Gore’s information superhighway. These networks contain all of the information that describes us. I called it Metamerica in an article I wrote last year. Metadata is data that describes other data, and Metamerica is the information that describes us.

If you need a good way to think about metadata and data, consider this. What use are the data on your iPod without a directory to tell you what songs the data represents. Let’s say you have 10,000 songs on your iPod, without the directory of songs (the metadata) the data (your music files) are practically useless. In the information age, America without Metamerica would also be practically useless. Where is Metamerica? It is in the data centers at Google, the IRS, our banks and financial institutions, medical facilities, business networks and even on our home computers. And, for all practical purposes it is unprotected and unprotectable.

This fact alone should be enough to scare any thinking person. But I have not yet begun to describe the hard part of the problems we are facing.

What is a war? The dictionary says it’s an “armed conflict between nations.” The dictionary does not say what they have to be armed with. What is terrorism? What is a crime?

In the Information Age, what is a country? What is a state? What is a nation? What is a tribe? What is a community of interest? What is an enemy? Where do they live? Do they need to be people?

What are weapons? What are military targets? What are civilian targets?

The US Defense Department’s Quadrennial Defense Review, published this week, highlighted the rising threat posed by cyber-warfare on space-based surveillance and communications systems. “On any given day, there are as many as 7 million DoD (Department of Defense) computers and telecommunications tools in use in 88 countries using thousands of war-fighting and support applications. The number of potential vulnerabilities, therefore, is staggering.” the review said.

“Moreover, the speed of cyber attacks and the anonymity of cyberspace greatly favor the offence. This advantage is growing as hacker tools become cheaper and easier to employ by adversaries whose skills are growing in sophistication.”

Defensive measures have already begun. Last June the Pentagon created US Cyber Command. But … how will we know when we are being attacked by a country, an enemy, a terrorist, a criminal, a mob, a gang, an individual? When would the military know it was supposed to get into the fight? CIA? NSA? FBI? Google Security? A consortium of concerned citizens with anti-virus software on steroids? How can you tell an invasion from a teen-age prank?

William Lynn, US deputy defense secretary, described the cyber challenge as unprecedented. “Once the province of nations, the ability to destroy via cyber now also rests in the hands of small groups and individuals: from terrorist groups to organized crime, hackers to industrial spies to foreign intelligence services … This is not some future threat. The cyber threat is here today, it is here now,” Lynn said.

I spend a fair amount of my time counseling my clients on how to deal with the fact that 2010 is the middle of the analog to digital transition. Today, we have analog leaders and digital citizens. Analog commanders and digital soldiers. If the pen is mightier than the sword, the “digital pen” is mightier than a million ball points! Forget the threat of cyber-attacks for a second and think about how an enemy might use the power of social networking and the ability to instantly publish any type of message globally to their advantage.

It’s time to rethink the public Internet, computer networks and the infrastructure of our digital world. The currency of information is as important and valuable to our economic sovereignty as tangible stores of value. Bits of gold dust or bits of information … in the super-digital age, they deserve equal protection.

Shelly Palmer is the host of "Digital Life with Shelly Palmer," a weekly half-hour television show about living and working in a digital world which can be seen on WNBC-TV’s NY Nonstop Tuesdays at 10p Eastern and online, and the host of "MediaBytes," a daily news show that features insightful commentary and a unique insiders take on the biggest stories in technology, media, and entertainment. He is Managing Director of Advanced Media Ventures Group, LLC an industry-leading advisory and business development firm and the President of the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, NY (the organization that bestows the coveted Emmy® Awards). Mr. Palmer is the author of Television Disrupted: The Transition from Network to Networked TV (2008, York House Press) and the upcoming, Get Digital: Reinventing Yourself and Your Career for the 21st Century Economy (2009, Lake House Press). You can join the MediaBytes mailing list here. Shelly can be reached at shelly@palmer.net For information visit www.shellypalmer.com

Blog - Saturday January 30, 2010 - 6 Comments

Apple’s Maxi iPad with Wings For Extra Protection

As a Jobsian supplicant and an Apple acolyte, I really, really want to love the iPad. No one on Earth has made me buy more stuff I don’t need with money I don’t have than Steve Jobs. He’s my hero. One writer who came to visit me in my home office looked around and observed, “It looks like Steve Jobs threw up in here.” It does. There are three MacBooks, two MacBook Pros, one Mac Pro, several 30″ Apple monitors, an Airport, dozens of iPods from every generation, a couple of iPod Touches, plus my old and my new iPhone 3Gs. Apple, Apple everywhere and only one lonely PC in sight. (I use the PC so I can feel the pain and suffering of the other 92% of the computing world, keep up on the latest virus issues and bash the crap out of Windows — which is a full contact sport in my world.)

So, with this insane fanboy intro, you should be expecting a serious love letter to Cupertino about their latest offering, the iPad. Not going to happen.

Artist's conception of an Apple Maxipad with wings, the actual iPad is not flexible and doesn't have wings.Behold the iPad. Obviously, no female staffers were consulted while the C-suite was approving the name. iTampon was a huge trending topic on the day the device was introduced, along with “Tampad,” which is also funny, but a little gross. Moving past the name, I am trying to understand what the iPad is and why it needs to exist.

It is beautiful, sexy, Applesque, remarkable, awe-inspiring, extraordinary and every other adjective Apple management could find in the thesaurus. I agree. It’s all those things. But beauty is only skin deep. Let’s have a quick look at what it is and what it isn’t.

The iPad is a very big iPod Touch. If you have extra money to spend, you can add the spotty, woefully inadequate AT&T 3G network. That would make it a cloud-connected device with “anytime” minutes. As in, “any time you can get a signal.” If not, it’s a very big iPod Touch.

Like the iPod Touch, it is a consumption device, not a creation device. It has no camera. This doesn’t seem to be a big deal, except that Video chatting is one of the fastest growing behaviors and the iPad’s “intimate” approach to computing (Steve Jobs’s own words, not mine, so no snickers about feminine protection and intimacy) would seem to leave you wanting for that capability.

It has no USB support. So, you are locked into the convention of connecting to the iTunes/App Store/iBookstore software on your computer to move files to and from the iPad. There will be a huge issue with converting HD video files and many other types of files for use on the device. There are some annoying dongles that can be used to read an SD card (from your camera) or output video to an external monitor (like your TV). Knowing Apple, they will be $30 bucks a pop and, if you’re like me, you’ll lose them constantly.

The screen is 1024×768. This is a 4×3 aspect ratio VGA display. It is not HD compatible. You cannot play HD video on the device. And, 16×9 (HD formatted) video will have to be viewed in a letterbox. Astoundingly, it outputs composite video. It is very possible that your new HDTV does not have a composite video input. However, there is some good news, video from the iPad will look smoking hot on anything with a Cathode Ray Tube display. So don’t throw out your old Sony Trinitron, color tube TV may be coming back!

Like the iPhone family of devices, you cannot play Flash video on an iPad. (Apple hates Adobe, this is unlikely to change.) So you are going to see a lot of blue boxes where streaming video and Flash applications appear on websites. Since 98% of computers with web browsers are Flash enabled, your multi-media web browsing experience will be somewhat sub-optimal, and I’m being kind.

I could go on, but the lack of USB support is the deal breaker. This is not a computer, not an iPod, not a netbook, not a notebook … it is an extension of the Apple ecosystem.

If you need to drink the proverbial Kool-Aid to have an iPhone or even “be” a Mac Person, you’ll need a gallon jug of the stuff to get you to buy into the iPad.

Would it have killed them to put a working USB port in the thing? How about a little iSight camera facing you? And, what were they thinking with the OS? You can only run one app at a time. Like an iPhone or iPod Touch, the OS can only run one app at a time. I’m writing this article on my MacBook Pro, let’s see how many apps I have open: MS Word, Mac Mail, Firefox, Address Book, Daylite, Omnifocus, Adobe Bridge, Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator, Keynote, PowerPoint, Lightroom, Soundtrack Pro, iTunes and the all-important Text Expander running in the background. (Text Expander, from Smile On My Mac Software, is the single most useful app on a Mac and it would be 100 times more useful running on an iPhone or iPod Touch while other programs are running so you could, um … expand your text.) One app at a time? You must be kidding me.

The iPad is an extension of the Apple ecosystem. Once you enter, you will be trapped (lovingly, beautifully, thrillingly) inside. They will give you all of the software for free, a word processor (Pages), a spreadsheet (Numbers), presentation software (Keynote), photo software (iPhoto), email (Mac Mail), etc., all part of the ecosystem. You will buy books, magazines, music, movies, all neatly presented inside a prison of such striking beauty; you may not realize that you are being held captive. This model will be awesome for content creators and publishers. They will be able to charge you and know you paid. (Except for the recorded music industry, which is circling the drain and is not responding to treatment.)

Will the iPad capture the minds of consumers? Will it start new industries? Is it a paradigm shift or a parlor trick? I don’t know. Being a Kindle owner (and lover) and looking at the iPad e-reader app, the iPad wins no contest — oh, wait … no it doesn’t. The backlit screen is not e-ink and your eyes will fatigue like they do on a computer. The battery won’t last anywhere near as long, it’s double to four times the price before you add the data plan. All true, but the iPad is beautiful and the apps are magnificent looking and … hold on, I’ve spilled some blue liquid out of my Kool-Aid cup. Thankfully the iPad is Maxi-sized and has wings for extra protection.

Shelly Palmer is the host of "Digital Life with Shelly Palmer," a weekly half-hour television show about living and working in a digital world which can be seen on WNBC-TV’s NY Nonstop Tuesdays at 10p Eastern and online, and the host of "MediaBytes," a daily news show that features insightful commentary and a unique insiders take on the biggest stories in technology, media, and entertainment. He is Managing Director of Advanced Media Ventures Group, LLC an industry-leading advisory and business development firm and the President of the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, NY (the organization that bestows the coveted Emmy® Awards). Mr. Palmer is the author of Television Disrupted: The Transition from Network to Networked TV (2008, York House Press) and the upcoming, Get Digital: Reinventing Yourself and Your Career for the 21st Century Economy (2009, Lake House Press). You can join the MediaBytes mailing list here. Shelly can be reached at shelly@palmer.net For information visit www.shellypalmer.com

Blog - Saturday January 23, 2010 - Add Comment

Sexting Is More Than Pix

Can you translate this dialog: kotl. iwsn. gypo. l8r. now. 2 c-p. 459. ruh. 143. im so fah, gypo. lmirl. no, gnoc. pir. ttfn. (Answer key at the bottom of the article.)

Don’t you speak Sext? About half of the 13-19-year-olds in America do. Add a still picture or video taken in the shower and you have all the ingredients you need to publish what used to be a very private moment.

The Chicago Tribune reported:

“In the last five years, the time that America’s 8- to 18-year-olds spend watching TV, playing video games and using a computer for entertainment has risen by 1 hour, 17 minutes a day, the Kaiser Family Foundation said. Young people now devote an average of 7 hours, 38 minutes to daily media use, or about 53 hours a week — more than a full-time job. “What surprised me the most is the sheer amount of media content coming into their lives each day,” said Kaiser’s Vicky Rideout, who directed the study. “When you step back and look at the big picture, it’s a little overwhelming.” The numbers zoom even higher if you consider kids’ multitasking — such as listening to music while on the computer. That data show young people are marinating in media for what amounts to 10 hours, 45 minutes a day — an increase of almost 2.25 hours since 2004.”

The Kaiser Family Foundation study attempts to quantify what we all know from our personal experience: We live in a connected world. This is not news at all. Even the amount of time spent with the devices doesn’t seem newsworthy. But there are a few items here that we might take a moment to think about.

First, there is no socio-techno divide. Technology is seamlessly woven into the fabric of the lives of every “Born Digital,” that’s kids born after 1989. You can no longer ask, “Should we get little Johnny a cell phone?” The question now is, “Which cell phone is best for little Johnny?” You can’t “protect” or “shield” kids from technology — it is a pervasive force in our culture. And, perhaps most importantly, you cannot alter how people’s behaviors will evolve with technology, you can only seek to understand it and make both the upside and downsides known.

I’m sure some of you will push back on the last point. After all, in our society we use the rule of law to regulate harmful acts and even harmful tools. You need a license to drive a car, buy a gun (in most States), you need a prescription to legally purchase drugs, you must have attained the age of majority to purchase tobacco products and alcohol. We even have child pornography laws to protect our children from sexual predators. I’m stating the obvious, most of us are completely aware of the laws surrounding the doing of life. You shouldn’t drive drunk. You shouldn’t break the speed limit. You shouldn’t download music or movie files you don’t have rights to, etc.

The problem is that police rarely come to your home and arrest you for file-sharing and you have to get caught to get a speeding ticket. When a 15-year-old girl sends a video of herself, naked and doing seductive things, to an 18-year-old boy she hardly knows, what should happen? She has broken any number of child pornography laws. So has he. What to do?

Moving on, if you are paying for your teen’s cell phone, should you have the right to read (and decode) the opening paragraph of this article? What would you do with the information? Would you listen to that conversation if it were a voice call? Would you eavesdrop if the conversation took place on your living room couch?

There was a “sexual revolution” in the 60’s. It was a decade of transition. Hippies, transformed into Disco Queens, LSD went out of vogue, Cocaine became the coin of the realm, each subsequent decade had its own kind of revolution. The 21st century finds its teens empowered with media tools — and they are using them in extremely social ways.

Before you can find a solution, you need to identify that you (all of us) have a problem. It’s a simple one best described by my favorite George Bernard Shaw quote: “Every profession is a conspiracy against the laity.” In this case, teens are the social media professionals and we are the lay public. Do you speak 14-year-old? Perhaps it’s time to learn.

kotl: Kiss on the lips.
iwsn: I want sex now.
gypo: Get your pants off.
l8r: Later.
now: Now.
2 c-p: Too sleepy.
459: I love you.
ruh: Are you horny?
143: I love you.
im so fah: I’m so f***ing hot.
gypo: Get your pants off.
lmirl: Let’s meet in real life.
no, gnoc: No, get naked on camera.
pir: Parents in room.
ttfn: Ta ta for now.

Shelly Palmer is the host of "Digital Life with Shelly Palmer," a weekly half-hour television show about living and working in a digital world which can be seen on WNBC-TV’s NY Nonstop Tuesdays at 10p Eastern and online, and the host of "MediaBytes," a daily news show that features insightful commentary and a unique insiders take on the biggest stories in technology, media, and entertainment. He is Managing Director of Advanced Media Ventures Group, LLC an industry-leading advisory and business development firm and the President of the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, NY (the organization that bestows the coveted Emmy® Awards). Mr. Palmer is the author of Television Disrupted: The Transition from Network to Networked TV (2008, York House Press) and the upcoming, Get Digital: Reinventing Yourself and Your Career for the 21st Century Economy (2009, Lake House Press). You can join the MediaBytes mailing list here. Shelly can be reached at shelly@palmer.net For information visit www.shellypalmer.com

Blog - Sunday January 17, 2010 - 2 Comments

Haiti: Help Now, Then Think!

It’s odd how well a cell phone lights up a space when there is no other light source. It’s a cold, robotic light that casts eerie, inorganic shadows. I thought about this last night after a television news report from Haiti. The video was so graphic; the suffering so extraordinary, it made me wonder how scared they all must be at night. No light, no water, no trappings of civilization … just the occasional glow from an unusable cell phone shedding a little light on a world destroyed.

We’ve seen so many fake post-apocalyptic images, it’s hard to fully comprehend the pain and anguish that the people of Haiti must be experiencing. I’ve been out far and wide with two quick, easy ways for you to help. If you’ve got a cell phone, pick it up now and text Haiti to 90999 to donate $10 to the Red Cross through mGive. mGive has waived all of their transaction and licensing fees as have the carriers.

Now I’d like you to help me think about something. What kinds of tools were most needed in Haiti right after the earthquake? What technology could still function? What services could be provided? Is there a way to earthquake-proof a technocracy?

The cell towers have collapsed, as have many buildings. Electricity is out. No water, no sewage removal, no garbage removal, very little food. With basic social services unavailable, with no ability for a central government to communicate … what would you do? By the time you read this there will be thousands of relief workers and all kinds of gear landing on the island, but what would have been important in the immediate situation.

This is not really a rhetorical exercise. I’m trying to imagine what type of technologies need to be invented and deployed to enable a society (which is dependent upon technology) to function when a catastrophic event disables the normal doing of life: specifically in the critical 24-48 hours before help could arrive.

I took a look at Nicholas Negroponte’s One Laptop Per Child project to see if there were insights that might apply. The OLPC project assumes that electricity is scarce, the computers mesh together so that they don’t require a central server. The firmware includes some robust programs that will function without crashing such as, email, file transfers, etc. Would this help people communicate in the aftermath of an earthquake?

I looked at some solar messenger bags that charge during the day and have small LED lamps in them. The inside covers of the bags are made of reflective material so that they can be used as a good source of light. Having lots of these around would certainly help. There are hundreds of items that have been created that might solve some of the most emergent problems faced by a catastrophe. But very little, if any, high tech solutions were available in Haiti. Just getting supplies from the airport to the people is an overwhelming task — could technology have helped and, if so, what kind?

Moving forward, if we think a month into the future … after basic human services and law and order are restored — how do we get the civilization back? Where is the data? Where is the art? Where is the history? Where is the institutional memory? Haiti is an island nation. It is not replicated elsewhere on Earth. How do we get it back?

I hope that you will give what you can to the relief effort. And, if you have a minute, give some thought to what we should invent to help us remain functional in a disaster, quickly recover and, perhaps as importantly, “back up” our world?

Shelly Palmer is the host of "Digital Life with Shelly Palmer," a weekly half-hour television show about living and working in a digital world which can be seen on WNBC-TV’s NY Nonstop Tuesdays at 10p Eastern and online, and the host of "MediaBytes," a daily news show that features insightful commentary and a unique insiders take on the biggest stories in technology, media, and entertainment. He is Managing Director of Advanced Media Ventures Group, LLC an industry-leading advisory and business development firm and the President of the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, NY (the organization that bestows the coveted Emmy® Awards). Mr. Palmer is the author of Television Disrupted: The Transition from Network to Networked TV (2008, York House Press) and the upcoming, Get Digital: Reinventing Yourself and Your Career for the 21st Century Economy (2009, Lake House Press). You can join the MediaBytes mailing list here. Shelly can be reached at shelly@palmer.net For information visit www.shellypalmer.com

Blog - Sunday January 10, 2010 - Add Comment

Amazon Kindle 2 vs. Kindle DX

A bunch of e-readers will be coming to market in the next few months. Each is offering its own brand of ecosystem and a host of features. But right now, if you want an e-reader, the most popular choice is Amazon’s Kindle. So, I thought I would be fun to compare their two offerings, the Kindle 2 and the Kindle DX and give you some insights into which might be right for you.

Before we get started there is one thing you need to understand. When you buy a Kindle (Kindle 2 or Kindle DX) you are buying into the Amazon Ecosystem. This means that you are agreeing you let Amazon completely control your legal, legitimate, files.

This is both a strength and a weakness of Kindle e-readers. The concept of an e-book is not well understood by anyone. Do I have to lend you my Kindle to lend you a book on my Kindle? Can I let you “use” or “borrow” my file? The answer to these questions is a resounding, “No.”

However, you can register up to six Kindles on one Amazon account with one credit card. This entitles you to share books between all of the Kindles on the account. It also will wreak havoc with your Amazon recommendation engine. Having four to six different readers buying books from your Amazon account pretty much defeats all of Amazon’s ability to recommend new books that are individually appropriate.

Here’s an important note: Even though you can share books between Kindles on the same account, you cannot easily, wirelessly, share periodicals between them. It requires you to go to your Amazon Kindle Page and do some serious gymnastics with your mouse. Many clicks, many times.

If the inconvenience of several clicks, several times is too bothersome for you, you can purchase multiple subscriptions. For example if you have four people in your family with Kindles who each want the NY Times you would each have to pay the $13.99/month subscription fee at 55.96/month for all four kindle owners in my family adding up to almost $700 for the entire year. Ouch!

The Kindle 2, which is the second generation Amazon Kindle, has a 6″ screen and is about the size of a 8″ x 5″ book. You may think that the small screen is a disadvantage, it isn’t. The Kindle 2 is the perfect size for your briefcase or for your handbag, and, it’s very easy to hold. You can easily type on the keyboard without putting the unit down. This is a plus. And, although it is not an instantly obvious difference, the numbers each have their own keys.

The newer Kindle DX has a 9.7″ screen and it is much bigger, about 10.5″ x 7″. It’s heavier, and it’s very hard to hold with one hand. The keyboard requires you to use the alt key to type numbers. So there’s almost no way you can type on it without putting it down. If you like to annotate your books and papers, this is an issue.

People make a big deal out of the fact that you can set the Kindle DX to auto-rotate the screen (like an iphone). The bad news here is that it chews into your battery life and, worse, if you are reading at an angle, you may accidentally flip the image. So, in practice, it’s a feature you will never use.

If you seen the Kindle 2, you know that it has control buttons on each side of the unit where your thumbs naturally fall. The bigger Kindle DX only has buttons on one side. This really becomes an issue when you need to rotate the screen.

Although you can transfer word documents and PDF files to either Kindle through Amazon, you can attach the larger Kindle DX to your computer and drag a PDF file right into the document folder. If you are going to read a lot of PDF files on your Kindle, you should seriously consider the Kindle DX. Not because of the native PDF support, oddly enough: but because there is really no zoom control for PDF’s and you will need the larger screen to read them.

Which to buy? I have both. If that’s not an option for you, the smaller Kindle 2 is a wonderful, dedicated e-reader. It’s priced right and you won’t be too sad in a few months when new models come out with more features. The Kindle DX is expensive and doesn’t have enough additional features to justify its price tag, unless you are a heavy PDF user.

In summary, you will enjoy either Kindle, but if you’re not sure you need the larger Kindle DX, get the Kindle 2. It will truly change everything about the way you read.

Shelly Palmer is the host of "Digital Life with Shelly Palmer," a weekly half-hour television show about living and working in a digital world which can be seen on WNBC-TV’s NY Nonstop Tuesdays at 10p Eastern and online, and the host of "MediaBytes," a daily news show that features insightful commentary and a unique insiders take on the biggest stories in technology, media, and entertainment. He is Managing Director of Advanced Media Ventures Group, LLC an industry-leading advisory and business development firm and the President of the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, NY (the organization that bestows the coveted Emmy® Awards). Mr. Palmer is the author of Television Disrupted: The Transition from Network to Networked TV (2008, York House Press) and the upcoming, Get Digital: Reinventing Yourself and Your Career for the 21st Century Economy (2009, Lake House Press). You can join the MediaBytes mailing list here. Shelly can be reached at shelly@palmer.net For information visit www.shellypalmer.com

« Previous Entries Next Entries »

Trojan Phones: The New New Virus Vehicle

Imagine buying a new SD card for your digital camera. You go into the store, find a nice 32GB Class 6 SD card at the right price and take it home. It's sealed in one of those plastic display cards that takes remarkably sharp objects to open them. It's new, ... Read More