Blog - Saturday October 10, 2009 - 5 Comments

FTC’s Blogger Endorsement Rules & Regs: Not Really Needed

On the subject of blogger endorsement guidelines, the FTC said: “The commission disagrees with those who suggest that including in the guides examples based on these new media would interfere with the vibrancy of these new forms of communication, or that the commission should, instead, defer to industry self-regulation,” the commission wrote. “The guides merely elucidate the commission’s interpretation of [the FTC Act] but do not expand (or limit) its application to various forms of marketing.”

Want to have a really good time? Try getting through the other 81 pages of the “Federal Trade Commission, 16 CFR Part 255, Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.” It’s a page-turner!!!

If this wasn’t the driest document I have ever forced myself to read, and, if this document didn’t illustrate one of the biggest problems that brands and consumers are going to face in the 21st Century, it would actually be funny.

Let’s review. Five years ago, including VHF, UHF, Low Power, Cable, Radio, etc. there were about 25,000 broadcasters in the United States. Today, let’s pick a number … there are ~55,000,000 entities and organizations that, at the touch of a button, can broadcast a message worldwide.

You will now push back and say that there are really only six major media companies that can broadcast worldwide, and the best everyone else do is make their content available to a worldwide audience. I’m fine with that distinction. It will not have any impact on the thesis of this writing.

The currency of the advertising business is attention. We “pay” attention to things that interest us and we “receive” attention from things that are interested in us. You do not need to use any complex mathematics to illustrate that the number ~55,000,000 is much larger than the number 25,000. Even if every individual only pays a little attention to something other than the original 25,000 broadcast entities, the shift in their attention will be very large.

This is the simplest way to describe what has happened to communications in the 21st Century, but the impact is being felt in much more subtle ways across all of the related disciplines. For advertisers and marketers, consumers seem to be more in control than ever before. For broadcasters and advertisers, audiences now seem atomized rather than fragmented. For consumers, there is simply too much to choose from, too much to pay attention to.

The FTC has noticed that people are paying attention to lots of different things. They have also noticed that they are not really set up to deal with ~55,000,000 purveyors of information. It’s not just a problem for the FTC, it is an endemic problem of our time. They have a mission. They work for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. But the tools to deal with this in the information age simply do not exist.

Let’s say I’m a blogger, a micro-blogger, someone with 5,000 Facebook friends, a large group of LinkedIn contacts, a huge MySpace or Twitter following and I get a free camera from a CE manufacturer … shouldn’t I have to disclose the freebee? Would a new, young mother seeking advice from a semi-professional mommyblogger think more or less of the information she gets about a particular brand of stroller if she knew that the mommyblogger was getting paid to tout its virtues? Wouldn’t it be great if everyone (because there is now absolutely no distinction between professional and amateur journalists) that wrote about stuff had to make a full disclosure as to their particular motivations? It would also be great if there really was a Santa Claus.

The FTC guidelines are wonderful. So is the Golden Rule. But that doesn’t mean people will apply them. There is absolutely no way that this problem gets fixed; in fact, there is no probable future where it doesn’t get worse. How much worse? We are witnessing the very beginning of a metaphoric tectonic plate shift unlike any thing we have ever experienced.

“I know of scarcely anything so apt to impress the imagination as the wonderful form of cosmic order expressed by the ‘Law of Frequency of Error.’” Said Sir Francis Galton (Natural Inheritance, 1889) as he went on to describe the Central Limit Theorem. “The law would have been personified by the Greeks and deified, if they had known of it. It reigns with serenity and in complete self-effacement, amidst the wildest confusion. The huger the mob, and the greater the apparent anarchy, the more perfect is its sway. It is the supreme law of Unreason. Whenever a large sample of chaotic elements are taken in hand and marshaled in the order of their magnitude, an unsuspected and most beautiful form of regularity proves to have been latent all along.”

Central Limit Theorem or Law of Large Numbers, which ever one you like to apply to this kind of problem, you’re going to get the same general result. The millions of random bloggers and neuvo-broadcasters can create as chaotic a world as they like, but the trend is going to come out in the wash — more attention will be spent on lots of little things and less attention will be spent of few big things.

One probable outcome of this trend is the self-assembling of small trust circles around individuals who can pay and receive attention only to known entities that have earned and kept their trust. Can big media play a roll? Can big brands? Can big anything work its way into your trust circle?

No regulatory agency is going to be able to govern this explosive amount of widely distributed information. But that’s OK, it will truly take care of itself.

Shelly Palmer is a consultant and the host of MediaBytes a daily show featuring news you can use about technology, media & entertainment. He is Managing Director of Advanced Media Ventures Group LLC and the author of Television Disrupted: The Transition from Network to Networked TV (2008, York House Press). Shelly is also President of the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, NY (the organization that bestows the coveted Emmy Awards). You can join the MediaBytes mailing list here. Shelly can be reached at shelly@palmer.net For information visit www.shellypalmer.com

Comments

5 Responses to “FTC’s Blogger Endorsement Rules & Regs: Not Really Needed”
  • Mark Harrison October 12th, 2009 6:18 am

    Great post, Shelly! I wanted to respond directly to one of the many
    excellent questions you raised; specifically, the very last one in
    your article: “Can big anything work its way into your trust
    circle?” That one question I can answer with an authoritative “Yes
    we can.” (to use an illustrative example). It’s what my team at
    Abraham Harrison, LLC does day in and day out, and has been doing
    for over three years now (quick clarity: the amazing Obama campaign
    I just alluded to was the brilliant Thomas Gensemer’s… not ours.
    A deep bow to that master of communication and to Blue State
    Digital!) You can connect to these many, many dispersed influencers
    at the centers of these smallish trust circles and have them carry
    your message in their voices, and in their names to their listeners
    who have chosen them as their opinion-leaders. It works for
    business just as well as it works for politics - perhaps better as
    it is rarely such an overt either-or message. It is CERTAINLY not a
    question of paying the infuencers or engaging in “blogola” of any
    sort. It is simply a matter of communicating the proper information
    in the proper manner to the proper key people: -Selection of the
    right influencers who will have a natural interest in your message
    (generally in the hundreds or thousands, as circles of real trust
    are generally relatively small and tight) - Clear, precise, and
    above all, personable communication with these influencers - in the
    language and according to the constantly evolving social mores of
    the demographic - Immediate, generous, personal follow-up and -
    Well-structured, easy-to-”steal” content for the influencers to
    leverage in their communication out to their listeners We actually
    find these new FTC rules a pleasant contribution to the world - a
    bit like a UN resolution or a “clean up your dog’s poo” law:
    definitely unlikely to be enforced universally, but very good at
    finally defining openly and for the whole community what is “good”
    behavior, and what is “offensive” behavior - and laying down a
    basis for future action, if there are particularly egregious
    offenders going forward. Again, thanks for another excellent and
    thought-provoking post! Feel free to ping me any time if you want
    to chat about this stuff further. It would be a pleasure to
    connect!

  • Our CEO Comments on Shelly Palmer’s Blog | Marketing Conversation™ October 12th, 2009 11:13 am

    [...] = ‘marcon’; On Saturday, Shelly Palmer weighed in on the
    FTC’s Blogger Endorsement Rules and Regs: Not Really Needed. 
    Great post. My CEO, Mark Harrison, himself, weighed in in a comment
    that I would like to share [...]

  • Oh Captain my Captain on FTC Regulations | Chris Abraham October 12th, 2009 4:31 pm

    [...] = ‘chrisabraham’; On Saturday, Shelly Palmer weighed in on
    the FTC’s Blogger Endorsement Rules and Regs: Not Really
    Needed.  Great post. My CEO, Mark Harrison, himself, weighed
    in in a comment that I would like to share [...]

  • Reginald W October 12th, 2009 10:33 pm

    For all the amateur journalists, this is all about ETHICS. When you
    say one thing, but do another, when you lie about your impartiality
    as to why you say one thing, then you are experiencing a definite
    LACK of ethics. Bill Clinton was impeached not for having sex with
    Monica Lewinsky, but for lying about having sex with Monica
    Lewinsky. Al Capone didn’t go to jail for killing people, gambling
    or running booze, he went to jail for not filing his income tax.
    Pat Robertson railed on about the evils that others do and then
    does the exact thing he rails against others about. Gary Hart
    didn’t run for US President because he was caught fooling around
    while acting like he was a “moral” person, at least as far as the
    US population wanted a “moral” person to behave. . In your 55
    million broadcaster example, people will not know who most of these
    bloggers are, except for their on-line reputation. That reputation
    is based upon what they say, how they say it and whether they
    really mean it. Those who sell their reputation for a few dollars
    LOSE their reputation, which is why they vehemently deny doing
    something until they are proven to have actually done it, and then
    the “I’m sorry that I was caught, I didn’t mean to be caught and
    I’ll continue lying to you once this is over but I’ll be “honest”
    for the moment.” . The FTC rules do not mean that no one will take
    someone’s money to promote a product, but if caught they DO
    introduce some teeth against those who have no ethics. Those who
    take money or product to endorse a product or company thus become a
    target if they are not honest about their opinion. . I have no idea
    who you are Shelly, but your opposition to the simply policy of
    disclosure leads me to question your ethics. When people question
    your ethics, your morality, your objectivity, your impartiality,
    then you have lost a lot. That you can’t see that means that I have
    zero trust in your opinion about anything that you might have to
    say. I’m a no-body to the 55 million people out there or the
    multiple billion people on the planet, but I still get to put those
    people that I don’t trust into my ignore list. Enough people who
    feel the same way makes it much more difficult for dishonest people
    to gain an audience. . Just my opinion. I came to this site through
    another site that was mentioning about your comment about the FTC
    rule not being needed.

  • FTC’s Blogger Endorsement Rules & Regs | Web Analytics Blog | Web analytics October 16th, 2009 12:35 am

    [...] to write about the FTC’s new Blogging Regulations but figure
    what Shelly Palmer said about it is similar to what I’d say – that
    the FTC’s Blogger Endorsement Rules & Regs: Not [...]

Post a Comment

Login
Register

Trojan Phones: The New New Virus Vehicle

Imagine buying a new SD card for your digital camera. You go into the store, find a nice 32GB Class 6 SD card at the right price and take it home. It's sealed in one of those plastic display cards that takes remarkably sharp objects to open them. It's new, ... Read More