Blog, techno-politics - Friday August 1, 2008 - 7 Comments
Senator Ted “Tubes” Stevens Indictment is Appropriate Metaphor for U.S. Communication Power Shift
Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska is facing a seven-count indictment accusing him of accepting more than $250,000 in unreported gifts. The Washington Post reported that many Alaskans “greeted the news of Stevens’s indictment on corruption charges as if they were condemned to a pauper’s death, fearful that they will no longer be able to depend on the largess of ‘Uncle Ted.’
I never knew the Senator’s nickname was “Uncle Ted.” That name was given to him by the friends and constituents he hooked up with over $3.2 billion in earmarks over the past four years. My nickname for Senator Stevens is, and always will be, “Tubes.”
With all of the hoopla surrounding the Senator’s indictment for “making false statements,” people are forgetting that he should have been indicted for the same crime directly after his infamous speech on June 28, 2006.
My favorite quote from the speech is:
“Ten movies streaming across that, that Internet, and what happens to your own personal Internet? I just the other day got … an Internet was sent by my staff at 10 o’clock in the morning on Friday, I got it yesterday [Tuesday]. Why? Because it got tangled up with all these things going on the Internet commercially.”
But, “Tubes” Stevens got his nickname from this salient quip:
“… the Internet is not something that you just dump something on. It’s not a big truck. It’s a series of tubes. And if you don’t understand, those tubes can be filled and if they are filled, when you put your message in, it gets in line and it’s going to be delayed by anyone that puts into that tube enormous amounts of material …”
You just can’t make this stuff up. Not to put too fine a point on it. If the good Senator had just made the “tubes” quote, nobody would have come down on him. I call it a “fat pipe,” he calls it a “tube,” no biggy. But - it’s not the tubes that get clogged and when you couple that with his remarkable quote about getting an “Internet” from his staff, you just want to scratch your head.
This would be funny if he wasn’t an elected leader, Vice Chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and a member of the Subcommittee on Science, Technology, and Innovation.
Two other stories caught my attention this week and, although you may not see them as immediately related, they caused me to stop and think.
The International Olympic Committee was unable to get the Chinese government to allow unfettered Internet access for press and tourists during the upcoming Olympic games. And, Senator McCain put out a seriously pejorative advertisement asking the audience if Senator Obama was “… ready to lead?”
Taken together, I started to wonder how would our current presidential candidates describe the Internet and its associated technology? Do they have a firm grasp on the issues surrounding our telecommunications future? Do they know what the technical limitations of the medium are? Is either candidate ready to lead us past the information age into the age of cloud computing, reduction mapping and explosive data?
As much as the world has changed this year, it is nothing compared to what is about to happen. Tubes Steven’s indictment may be metaphoric. By this time next year, an average high school student will be able to run a reduction map algorithm on every score posted on Xbox live using cloud processing and some cloud storage. What will he do with the data? The question is rhetorical, don’t email me. I’m just pointing out that we are about to enter an era when kids, business people, moms, criminals and terrorists will all have access to that kind of computing power and the tubes really won’t fill up.
Is the elected leadership ready? Are the candidates? Tubes … enjoy the big house.
Shelly Palmer is Managing Director of Advanced Media Ventures Group LLC and the author of Television Disrupted: The Transition from Network to Networked TV (2006, Focal Press). Shelly is also President of the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, NY (the organization that bestows the coveted Emmy® Awards). He is the Vice-Chairman of the National Academy of Media Arts & Sciences an organization dedicated to education and leadership in the areas of technology, media and entertainment. Palmer also oversees the Advanced Media Technology Emmy® Awards which honors outstanding achievements in the science and technology of advanced media. You can read Shelly’s blog here. Shelly can be reached at shelly@palmer.net






Comments
7 Responses to “Senator Ted “Tubes” Stevens Indictment is Appropriate Metaphor for U.S. Communication Power Shift”Paula Lynn August 1st, 2008 3:26 pm
Tubes is just an over greedious, egotistical bastard who is also
suffering from some form of alzheimer’s/dementia. (Think Ronald
Regan.) McCain is more like a military deer in headlights. And I
sure hope that Obama would ask someone else if there was something
he didn’t know, knows more, in kind, about tech because he has had
to use it generationally and he has young children who will force
him to know more than his opponent. I vote for a cabinet post for
Shelly Palmer.
Terry Heaton August 2nd, 2008 9:18 am
An especially enjoyable post, Shelly. Thanks.
Time Warner Ready To Spin Off AOL: MediaBytes with Shelly Palmer August 4, 2008 | MediaBytes with Shelly Palmer August 4th, 2008 7:23 am
[...] Shelly’s commentary “Senator Ted ‘Tubes’ Stevens Indictment
is Appropriate Metaphor for U.S. Communica… on the [...]
Megan August 4th, 2008 7:33 am
Thanks for reminding people about how Ted Stevens got his nickname.
While we certainly have to wonder and worry about how the
presidential candidates will approach the Internet, we can also
celebrate the historic victory that happened for Net Neutrality
last week. The FCC finally came down on Comcast for illegally
blocking Internet traffic. If you’re unsure how are policymakers
are going to shape Internet legislation, make your voice heard:
https://secure.freepress.net/site/Advocacy?JServSessionIdr010=ndn73fg4w3.app43b&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=277
Wardy August 4th, 2008 8:19 am
I was under the impression (perhaps misguided) that most elected
officials, like Senators and congressmen, would have a
“fact-checker” on staff to prevent you from making a COMPLETE idiot
of yourself. Unless…. The staff they surround themselves with are
ALSO idiots, and yes-men… then that would make sense. Just my .02
cents…
Luke Carbis August 4th, 2008 3:18 pm
Hi Shelly, fantastic post. Tubesy, as he’s known to us here down
under, is always good for a bit of a laugh, but you have touched on
a really important issue here: Who is going to lead the U.S into a
new age of computing? Generation Y is the first digital native
generation - advances in technology, particularly internet
technology, is important to them. They are 25 years old now, and
starting to have some real influence in the polls. If the current
presidential hopefuls don’t respond to this - I believe we will see
some who do in 4 years time, when our Digital Native population is
almost 30!
Tim Halle August 4th, 2008 8:31 pm
Marc Andreessen spent and hour and a half with Obama in early ‘07
and found him to be fairly tech literate. See:
http://blog.pmarca.com/2008/03/an-hour-and-a-h.html Some larger
questions Shelly raises are addressed here:
http://mathoda.com/archives/189 Follow the Slashdot conversation on
the above here:
http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/03/26/1220248 Regards TH