Blog - Friday May 9, 2008 - 5 Comments
WiMax: One Step Closer to Life in a Broadband Cloud
How fast was the wireless network on the bridge of the Starship Enterprise? Its mission was to, “boldly go where no one had gone before.” And to do that, Gene Roddenberryimagined a space vehicle the size of a small city with a very powerful computer network and a serious wireless broadband cloud. It may have been science fiction in the 60s, but this week, it got one step closer to reality.
Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Intel, Google, Bright House Networks, Clearwire, Sprint Nextel and some other telecommunications companies have formed a consortium to build the first, next generation wireless network using a technology called WiMax. When it is built, consumers will be able to enjoy some very advanced wireless features — so advanced, in fact, the network and the devices that use it will actually change our behaviors on a large scale. High-speed, wireless broadband clouds will change telecommunications, entertainment, retail, medical, financial services, government and criminal activity. These are just a few of the benefits of cloud living — but don’t get too excited. It’s two to four years away.
WiMax (aka 802.16) has been around for a while. It has the potential to carry video, voice and data just like WiFi, only it’s much faster. How fast? It depends on a number of variables. On the low end, you can expect speeds that are similar to a ADSL connection (1.5 Mbps down, 768 Kbps up) like you get from your phone company over telephone lines — on the high end, maybe 6 Mbps symmetrical like you might purchase from your cable provider. The true benefit of this technology is that it is “per person,” not “per household.” That’s the possible upside. The possible downside is the same as it is today. You can only carry a 1.5 watt transceiver in your pocket (by law) and that means that the efficacy of the network’s upstream capacity will be limited by the number of towers that can be erected in a given area — just like cell phone towers.
That being said, a great deal of value can be found on the receiving-side or downlink side of any network. If you’re watching a movie or looking at a live image being sent by a friend, it’s all about downlink speed.
Is WiMax really a great way to create a broadband cloud? Verizon and AT&T don’t thinks so. They, along with T-Mobile, are working with a competing (and incompatible) technology called LTE (Long Term Evolution). Some say it will not be as fast as a WiMax network, but engineering arguments aside the important issue is that the two systems are incompatible. In other words, wireless device manufacturers will have to choose one system or the other for each device they wish to market.
This is a very unfortunate reality for our communications future. In fact, it is antithetical to the spirit of the “open source” provision that Verizon agreed to adhere to. Yes, anyone can make a device that will work with the new Verizon network — but leave an area covered by that network and your device will not work. Sounds like the early days of cell phone service, right? Only one caveat: back in the day, when you left one provider’s service area, your devices still worked, you just got charged extra for “roaming.” This will not be the case here. If you have a Verizon LTE device and you leave the 4G network area, your device will not function.
The answer is simple and obvious: create a nationwide network. Good thought. Who will write the check? When your cell phone doesn’t work in a rural area or in a pocket of low-density population, you just wait until you get into a covered area. It’s inconvenient, but not fatal. But, that’s not how we’re going to use advanced wireless devices. Think of how your life would change if you could carry your laptop in the palm of your hand, it had an interface like an iPhone, the capabilities of a MacBook Pro and the speed of a fast cable modem. You would very quickly come to rely on the benefits of such a device. Instant search, maps, entertainment, commerce, coupons, business and financial transactions, supermarket checkout, the list goes on forever.
Now, leave the coverage area. Oops. This will not be like your cell phone reception going dark in a specific area for a while. If you think about ubiquitous wireless high-speed Internet access, you also need to think about storing your data in the cloud. Imagine how your life would change with unlimited storage accessible via your device, as opposed to stored on it. Once you change your behaviors, you will not be able to transact your digital life outside the cloud. Humm …. Maybe we won’t have digital lives?
Some people just shrug this off and say, Betamax v. VHS, Blu-ray v. HD DVD — but there may not be a clear winner here for years. And even if there is, will they be economically incentivized to create a truly nationwide, ubiquitous network? What will consumers do in the meantime? The good news is that the average lifespan of a wireless device is only a few years. Everyone who has a use for the additional benefits of mobile high-speed will have a chance to own several generations of devices before this all gets worked out.
When the history of 21st Century interpersonal communication is written, it will start with the story of this consortium trying to do what the best of us aspire to — “to boldly going where no one has gone before.”
Shelly Palmer is Managing Director of Advanced Media Ventures Group LLC and the author of Television Disrupted: The Transition from Network to Networked TV (2006, Focal Press). Shelly is also President of the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, NY (the organization that bestows the coveted Emmy® Awards). He is the Vice-Chairman of the National Academy of Media Arts & Sciences an organization dedicated to education and leadership in the areas of technology, media and entertainment. Palmer also oversees the Advanced Media Technology Emmy® Awards which honors outstanding achievements in the science and technology of advanced media. You can read Shelly’s blog here. Shelly can be reached at shelly@palmer.net
Ni Hao! (Greetings) from mainland, China. I'm in a bustling metropolis called, Shenzhen which was a fishing village and assorted vegetable patches until about 20 years ago. (Shenzhen is just across from Hong Kong.) I'm staying at the Marco Polo Shenzhen. A hotel that ... 

Comments
5 Responses to “WiMax: One Step Closer to Life in a Broadband Cloud”Rudy Sevile May 9th, 2008 1:02 pm
There is a big conflict between LTE and WiMax I agree with that.
Mobile phone manufacturers are choosing which technology they wish
to put on their device. At the beginning it will be quiet annoying
to have a device that works only with one technology but in end, I
am quite sure both technology will be complementary to one another
and mobile devices will support both. This will be the same way we
use Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, they are complementary. Wi-Fi is a lot
faster than Bluetooth but we still use this techology for wireless
speakers or headsets.
Doug Houseman May 10th, 2008 8:12 pm
I agree that there will be conflict and that that will be bad. One
thing that may save us, is if the FCC grants the utility industry
the rights to use WiMax. The utilities need to reach every location
in their service territory, and that means a network that touches
the whole service area that the electric company or the gas company
covers. There are several very large US utilities and several
Canadian utilities that are working to set up WiMax in limited
areas for testing now. The Utility Telecom Council (UTC) petitioned
the FCC over a year ago to allow them access to the Public Safety
bandwidth (the failed auction this winter). The FCC so far has not
ruled. Think what would happen if the FCC said yes, and the
Utilities were allowed to build their networks. More than 99% of
homes have electricity from the utility companies, that would setup
a situation where the Sprints of the world could work out a way to
piggy back on what the utilities did (different frequencies maybe?
- same towers and backhaul infrastructure). and we could get a
clear winner - or at least a technology with a strong coverage.
GeorgeT6 May 12th, 2008 7:03 am
Forgive if this shows up as duplicate but it appears my first entry
did not take (or this comments tool does not like links listed) I
would be wary of proclaiming such grand statements as “…the devices
that use it will actually change our behaviors on a large scale”
Ala Steve Jobs comments on the Segway –(then known as ‘ginger’)
that cities would be architected around it. While WiMax may very
well deliver on the promise of providing total mobile to home
theater content delivery, recent reports tell a tale of struggle.
Despite financial backing from Cable companies and a healthy
interest by the media, several residential and commercial rollouts
have been delayed- multiple times. Sprint is publicly planning to
spin off WiMax as a separate entity. While this could indicate a
desire to nurture a format within its own hothouse a great deal
points to a financial strain on the parent company which needs to
be distanced from, Lucent anyone? WiMax may just be overrun by the
White Space revolution. Yes, it faces similar issues but it has an
unlicensed spectrum within which to operate. WiMax may just be
overrun by the White Space revolution. Yes, it faces similar issues
but it has an unlicensed spectrum within which to operate.
garryweil May 12th, 2008 11:51 am
Great take on the state of WiMax. My company has been betting a lot
on this but I am not personally part of that division. I would like
to poke just a bit at your prognostication though; why do you see
manufacturers being so black and white with LTE/WiMax capability.
Couldn’t they still continue to include legacy radios to cover the
coverage issue you suggest? Why couldn’t they, in fact, include
both LTE and WiMax radios in a single device? Keep up the great
podcast!
GeorgeT6 May 12th, 2008 3:02 pm
My previous post was mangled a bit by the inclusion of web links -
which the comments tool does not like at all, be fair warned. The
repeated section at the bottom of my post should have been: There
is still much debate on whether WiMax is 4G (as Sprint and backers
proclaim) or just a building block toward a true 4G. “Although
WiMax supporters claim that 4G is WiMax, we believe this is a
wrongful assertion. Future versions of WiMax may become potential
4G candidates, and OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division
Multiplexing) modulation will be a key component of 4G, but 4G is
definitely not WiMax. WiMax has served as a catalyst for 3GPP
(Third Generation Partnership Project) and 3GPP2 to accelerate
their next round of innovation, adopting OFDM modulation and
implementing MIMO and other smart antenna technologies. Both camps
have clearly defined their paths toward 4G.” source: Tech News
World – A futurist vision of WiMax is all fine and dandy but there
is far too much unsettled to pin any grand hope on.