Blog - Friday March 7, 2008 - 1 Comment

Oprah’s Webcast: The State-of-the-Art, But Not What You Think

oprah2.jpg

By now, everyone has heard about Oprah Winfrey’s webcast debacle earlier this week. Oprah, the smartest, richest, most successful person in the television business, decided to do a webcast. She promoted it as only she can. To execute, her people assembled the absolute best practices organizations available anywhere. They used the best online distribution platform: Move Networks. One of the best content distribution networks: Limelight. And, served it up on Oprah.com, which is as industrial strength a website as you are likely to come across.

With all that going for her, it was reasonable to assume that a fairly large group of people could come to the party and expect to be served. But that’s not what happened.

According to dozens of published reports, the demand that an Oprah-sized audience put on the Internet and the related infrastructure was just too great and the system crashed. Pundits everywhere used this particular event to tout their own theories about how many gigabits of bandwidth can actually be handled and, more importantly, why the Internet is not suited for live streaming at scale.

Many were comparing this event to New York Magazine’s problems when they published nude photos of Lindsay Lohan on their site. Others were reminiscing about the Victoria’s Secret streaming crash of 1999. And still others put forth the idea that “millions of people will never watch TV online.” They all got it wrong!

Move Networks does not use ordinary streaming techniques to move video around the Internet. Their platform uses a client-side request schema that is more related to downloading little .gif files than it is to playing back streaming video packets from a server. They have moved over 200 million streams of video for ABC alone. The platform truly provides one of the best long-form online television-like viewing experiences available.

Limelight also lives up to its reputation. They have servers all over the place and as far as content distribution networks are concerned, you can pay more, but you can’t do much better.

What actually happened? According to an executive closely tied to the project, they were up to about 800,000 users when a logical error in the caching servers caused the system to crash. It is important to understand that the only way to ever find a coding error like this is to put a system truly under stress. You can’t simulate 800,000 users in the lab, you need to play with live ammo. Kudos to Oprah and her team for pushing the envelope this hard.

The crash was not caused by a lack of bandwidth, an overwhelming number of users or any infrastructure issues at all. It was a simple coding error – nothing more. The error was identified and is now fixed. It is entirely possible that next Monday’s webcast will enjoy over a million users, maybe more.

Perhaps the key take-away from this experience is the fact that the Internet is truly global. This webcast was available in 149 countries. Oprah has the communicative power to bring people together from all over the world and this technology makes it possible with two-way, interactive connections. What a fantastic use of the Internet. I’m pretty confident that next week’s webcast will easily reach all of the people who want to watch it live.

As a practical reality, the current limit on a Move Networks/Limelight CDN system is probably 2 million simultaneous users. This number is a function of infrastructure, but it has nothing to do with the public Internet’s capabilities. It’s about the deployment of certain pieces of Move Networks technology around the net. If I had to venture a guess, I would say that Move will be the first organization to demonstrate 10 million simultaneous online viewers and I don’t think that demonstration is too far in the future.

As for online video quality — it is, of course, in the eyes of the beholder. But a quality video signal could be described as a continuous viewing experience with good color space at resolution that is acceptable to the viewer and suitable for the content.

Oprah has a very large, diverse audience with feet firmly planted on both sides of the digital divide. When a viewer asks, “why can’t I get good quality?” the answer could be a simple as, “your machine is too old and the CPU or video card is not fast enough.” Or, as complicated as, “there is too much contention on your LAN.” The benefit of Move is that it “breathes” correctly, lowering or increasing bit rates to match the best possible or expected playing environment. This native capability to leverage caches is the best way to get the job done. It’s not TV – it’s Online TV and, when taken as a whole, the benefits are huge.

So, let’s debunk some myths:

1) The Internet cannot handle a television-sized live streaming audience. False.

2) No current system can deliver over 1 million simultaneous video streams. False.

3) The cost of delivering that many one-to-one connections is prohibitive. False.

4) Oprah is so popular, she crashed the Internet. False.

5) The Internet cannot handle a Super Bowl-sized live streaming audience. True, but that’s what Television is for.

Oprah is one of the most future-thinking media executives in our business and her vision is second only to her ability to assemble extraordinary teams. What is the state-of-the-art for long-form video distribution on the public Internet? You can see an on-demand version right now at http://www.oprah.com/ondemand, or you can catch the next show live on March 10th.

Shelly Palmer is Managing Director of Advanced Media Ventures Group LLC and the author of Television Disrupted: The Transition from Network to Networked TV (2006, Focal Press). Shelly is also President of the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, NY (the organization that bestows the coveted Emmy® Awards). He is the Vice-Chairman of the National Academy of Media Arts & Sciences an organization dedicated to education and leadership in the areas of technology, media and entertainment. Palmer also oversees the Advanced Media Technology Emmy® Awards which honors outstanding achievements in the science and technology of advanced media. You can read Shelly’s blog here. Shelly can be reached at shelly@palmer.net

Comments

One Response to “Oprah’s Webcast: The State-of-the-Art, But Not What You Think”
  • truxter March 8th, 2008 12:34 pm

    Don’t believe one optimistic word from any public figure about the
    economy or humanity in general. They are all part of the problem.
    Its like a game of Monopoly. In America, the richest 1% now hold
    1/2 OF ALL UNITED STATES WEALTH. Unlike ‘lesser’ estimates, this
    includes all stocks, bonds, cash, and material assets held by
    America’s richest 1%. Even that filthy pig Oprah acknowledged that
    it was at about 50% in 2006. Naturally, she put her own
    ‘humanitarian’ spin on it. Calling attention to her own ‘good
    will’. WHAT A DISGUSTING HYPOCRITE SLOB. THE RICHEST 1% HAVE
    LITERALLY MADE WORLD PROSPERITY ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. Don’t fall
    for any of their ‘humanitarian’ CRAP. ITS A SHAM. THESE PEOPLE ARE
    CAUSING THE SAME PROBLEMS THEY PRETEND TO CARE ABOUT. Ask any
    professor of economics. Money does not grow on trees. The
    government can’t just print up more on a whim. At any given time,
    there is a relative limit to the wealth within ANY economy of ANY
    size. So when too much wealth accumulates at the top, the middle
    class slip further into debt and the lower class further into
    poverty. A similar rule applies worldwide. The world’s richest 1%
    now own over 40% of ALL WORLD WEALTH. This is EVEN AFTER you
    account for all of this ‘good will’ ‘humanitarian’ BS from
    celebrities and executives. ITS A SHAM. As they get richer and
    richer, less wealth is left circulating beneath them. This is the
    single greatest underlying cause for the current US recession. The
    middle class can no longer afford to sustain their share of the
    economy.. Their wealth has been gradually transfered to the richest
    1%. One way or another, we suffer because of their incredible
    greed. We are talking about TRILLIONS of dollars. Transfered FROM
    US TO THEM. Over a period of about 27 years. Thats Reaganomics for
    you. The wealth does not ‘trickle down’ as we were told it would.
    It just accumulates at the top. Shrinking the middle class and
    expanding the lower class. Causing a domino effect of
    socio-economic problems. But the rich will never stop. They will
    never settle for a reasonable share of ANYTHING. They will do
    whatever it takes to get even richer. Leaving even less of the pie
    for the other 99% of us to share. At the same time, they throw back
    a few tax deductable crumbs and call themselves ‘humanitarians’.
    Cashing in on the PR and getting even richer the following year. IT
    CAN’T WORK THIS WAY. Their bogus efforts to make the world a better
    place can not possibly succeed. Any ‘humanitarian’ progress made in
    one area will be lost in another. EVERY SINGLE TIME. IT ABSOLUTELY
    CAN NOT WORK THIS WAY. This is going to end just like a game of
    Monopoly. The current US recession will drag on for years and lead
    into the worst US depression of all time. The richest 1% will live
    like royalty while the rest of us fight over jobs, food, and
    gasoline. Crime, poverty, and suicide will skyrocket. So don’t fall
    for all of this PR CRAP from Hollywood, Pro Sports, and Wall Street
    PIGS. ITS A SHAM. Remember: They are filthy rich EVEN AFTER their
    tax deductable contributions. Greedy pigs. Now, we are headed for
    the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time. SEND A “THANK
    YOU” NOTE TO YOUR FAVORITE MILLIONAIRE. ITS THEIR FAULT. I’m not
    discounting other factors like China, sub-prime, or gas prices. But
    all of those factors combined still pale in comparison to that HUGE
    transfer of wealth to the rich. Anyway, those other factors are all
    related and further aggrivated because of GREED. If it weren’t for
    the OBSCENE distribution of wealth within our country, there never
    would have been such a market for sub-prime to begin with. Which by
    the way, was another trick whipped up by greedy bankers and
    executives. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. The credit industry has been
    ENDORSED by people like Oprah, Ellen, Dr Phil, and many other
    celebrities. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. Now, there are commercial ties
    between nearly every industry and every public figure. IT MAKES
    THEM RICHER. So don’t fall for their ‘good will’ BS. ITS A LIE. If
    you fall for it, then you’re a fool. If you see any real difference
    between the moral character of a celebrity, politician, attorney,
    or executive, then you’re a fool. WAKE UP PEOPLE. ITS ALL ABOUT THE
    MONEY. The 1% club will always say or do whatever it takes to get
    as rich as possible. Without the slightest regard for anything or
    anyone but themselves. Reaganomics. Their idea. Loans from China.
    Their idea. NAFTA. Their idea. Outsourcing. Their idea. Sub-prime.
    Their idea. The commercial lobbyist. Their idea. The multi-million
    dollar lawsuit. Their idea. $200 cell phone bills. Their idea. $200
    basketball shoes. Their idea. $30 late fees. Their idea. $30 NSF
    fees. Their idea. $20 DVDs. Their idea. Subliminal advertising.
    Their idea. Brainwash plots on TV. Their idea. Prozac, Zanex,
    Vioxx, and Celebrex. Their idea. The MASSIVE campaign to turn every
    American into a brainwashed, credit card, pharmaceutical,
    love-sick, couch potatoe, celebrity junkie. Their idea. All of the
    above shrink the middle class, concentrate the world’s wealth and
    resources, and wreak havok on society. All of which have been
    CREATED AND ENDORSED by celebrities, athletes, executives,
    entrepreneurs, attorneys, and politicians. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. So
    don’t fall for any of their ‘good will’ ‘humanitarian’ BS. ITS A
    SHAM. NOTHING BUT TAX DEDUCTABLE PR CRAP. Bottom line: The richest
    1% will soon tank the largest economy in the world. It will be like
    nothing we’ve ever seen before. and thats just the beginning. Greed
    will eventually tank every major economy in the world. Causing
    millions to suffer and die. Oprah, Angelina, Brad, Bono, and Bill
    are not part of the solution. They are part of the problem. THERE
    IS NO SUCH THING AS A MULTI-MILLIONAIRE HUMANITARIAN. EXTREME
    WEALTH HAS MADE WORLD PROSPERITY ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. WITHOUT
    WORLD PROSPERITY, THERE WILL NEVER BE WORLD PEACE OR ANYTHING EVEN
    CLOSE. GREED KILLS. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL. Of course, the rich
    will throw a fit and call me a madman. Of course, their ignorant
    fans will do the same. You have to expect that. But I speak the
    truth. If you don’t believe me, then copy this entry and run it by
    any professor of economics or socio-economics. Then tell a friend.
    Call the local radio station. Re-post this entry or put it in your
    own words. Be one of the first to predict the worst economic and
    cultural crisis of all time and explain its cause.. WE ARE IN BIG
    TROUBLE.

Post a Comment

Login
Register

Trojan Phones: The New New Virus Vehicle

Imagine buying a new SD card for your digital camera. You go into the store, find a nice 32GB Class 6 SD card at the right price and take it home. It's sealed in one of those plastic display cards that takes remarkably sharp objects to open them. It's new, ... Read More